[152815] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [routing-wg] RPKI performance metrics; your help requested
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Arturo Servin)
Thu May 17 14:32:56 2012
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <m2k40ba2ps.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:31:42 -0300
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>,
Routing WG <routing-wg@ripe.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 17 May 2012, at 00:47, Randy Bush wrote:
>> Could someone make:
>> 2) put the graphs at 'not rpki.net' on rpki.net (too)
>=20
> no. that is the exact point. the graph to which i pointed is on =
rob's
> site. these are data each relying party can collect and see for
> themselves and their point of view in the universe,
Which I think it is a very valuable thing as a RP operator. I =
haven't used the lastest versions of RIPE NCC validator for myself but =
that would be a nice feature to have there as well. I will update my =
rcynic installation, I liked the graphs.
> not some central
> authority.
> ripe/ncc thinks it is the center of the universe. we do
> not. we know it is in freemont [0], a neighborhood of seattle.
I do not think that is the intention from RIPE NCC.
The intention as I understood is to get the data that each RP is =
getting and to send it to central repository for further analysis. Which =
it is a centralized approach but for simplicity, not for thinking that =
they are the center of the universe.
In my view there are 2 problems. One is to see as an RP operator =
how healthy are the repositories where you retrieve data (which for the =
url that you sent is done very nicely with rcynic), and two it is that =
as repository operator and protocol designers you'd like to see how good =
or bad your repository/protocols are doing to provide data to RPs in =
different locations of the world (which I think it is the aim of RIPE =
NCC effort).
>=20
> so that url is very intentionally rob's relying party instance. i =
have
> one at=20
> http://rgnet.rpki.net/
> but it has not been running as long as you can see.
>=20
> and sorry that our certs did not pay godzilla or gobble for the
> privilege of being in their bowsers. refund below [1]
>=20
> randy
>=20
> [0] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fremont,_Seattle
> =
http://www.stonerforums.com/lounge/members/guiness-albums-stuff-picture199=
71-center-known-universe-freemont.jpg
> =
http://www.waymarking.com/gallery/image.aspx?f=3D1&guid=3De712e7f5-0a55-4c=
c0-a40c-88deedce8d72&gid=3D3
If anybody else is willing to share its data and URLs about =
their RP performance, I would be nice. I have an old rsync installation =
that I will try to update this weekend. Now it is here but does not show =
too much:
http://www.labs.lacnic.net/~rpki/rpki-monitor/rpki-ta-status.xml
Regards,
as
