[152803] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [routing-wg] RPKI performance metrics; your help requested
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Wed May 16 19:52:20 2012
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 13:50:55 -1000
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Alex Band <alexb@ripe.net>
In-Reply-To: <C9BF7FC6-2BFC-4B71-9C98-BF874939DB26@ripe.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>,
Routing WG <routing-wg@ripe.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> As the global RPKI data set and system load grows, we want to ensure
> that the system is performing well. This is why we have added
> measurement functionality to the RIPE NCC RPKI Validator toolset:
> https://www.ripe.net/certification/rpki-validator-metrics
>
> When enabled, it will gather the following data and send it to the
> RIPE NCC for analysis:
good stuff. though you know how much i like centralization :)
of course you have seen the centralized rpki.net measurements presented
by rob at iepg
http://iepg.org/2012-03-ietf83/a-few-months-in-the-life-of-an-rpki-validator.pdf
and the measurements of an experiment using bit torrent instead of rsync
http://iepg.org/2012-03-ietf83/rpki-bittorrent-experiment.pdf
and sidr/paris. oops, good luck finding it, and he was cut short anyway
due to the meeting's tech fiasco.
but that is centralized. and, if you would care to publish your
collection protocol, we would look at having the rpki.net relying party
software shove data down it. but no promises.
but we're more focused on giving the *user* the tools to measure and
see. so you may want to look at the tables and graphs (graphs more
germane to this discussion) from the rpki.net relying party software at,
for example,
http://www.hactrn.net/opaque/rcynic/index.html
suggestions for improvement solicited, of course.
randy
