[152629] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NUD- ipV6.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mohacsi Janos)
Fri May 4 02:31:46 2012
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 08:31:04 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>
To: "S, Somasundaram (Somasundaram)" <somasundaram.s@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <7E79416ABDDDFC4E8C85571D0B5CAB3F1390732486@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi,
Not useful for router-router link. However it is very useful for
first-hop redundancy in data center environment - if you cannot implement
VRRP for some reason.
Best Regards,
Janos Mohacsi
Head of HBONE+ project
Network Engineer, Director Network and Multimedia
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Co-chair of Hungarian IPv6 Forum
Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
On Thu, 3 May 2012, S, Somasundaram (Somasundaram) wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> Would like to hear from you on the significance of IPV6 "Neighbor Unreachability detection (NUD)" specifically on the Router-Router link. While quick failure detection protocols like BFD are already present to detect the liveliness of the neighbor, does the providers/operators find NUD to be useful?
>
> Rgds/
> Somasundaram
>
