[152623] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NUD- ipV6.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tom Hill)
Thu May 3 18:39:14 2012
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 23:38:38 +0100
From: Tom Hill <tom@ninjabadger.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <7E79416ABDDDFC4E8C85571D0B5CAB3F1390732486@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 03/05/12 16:07, S, Somasundaram (Somasundaram) wrote:
> Hi Everyone, Would like to hear from you on the significance of IPV6
> "Neighbor Unreachability detection (NUD)" specifically on the
> Router-Router link. While quick failure detection protocols like BFD
> are already present to detect the liveliness of the neighbor, does
> the providers/operators find NUD to be useful?
>
> Rgds/ Somasundaram
Coming from an Alcatel address, presumably you're aiming for
MEF-compliance? i.e. "Can it detect a dead neighbour in 50ms or under?"
might be a better query.
I'd be interested to hear what people think, anyway. :)
Tom
