[152483] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: rpki vs. secure dns?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Kristoff)
Tue May 1 11:32:08 2012
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 10:31:11 -0500
From: John Kristoff <jtk@cymru.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m27gwx5ikh.wl%randy@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:46:06 -0400
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> > We need more flexible, distributed architecture behind - no matter -
> > which interests will be lobbied as we have got already.
>
> as i agree that there is a problem, i *very* eagerly await your
> proposal
As Radia says in her book, we're probably stuck with BGP forever, but I
frequently wonder if she is right in suggesting we could have done
better by having a link state protocol instead. It trades some set of
problems for another, but I don't find the dread this might instill
reason enough to avoid putting some research effort into it.
John
