[151511] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vitkovsky, Adam)
Fri Mar 23 09:54:49 2012
From: "Vitkovsky, Adam" <avitkovsky@emea.att.com>
To: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>, Aled Morris
<aledm@qix.co.uk>, Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:51:13 +0100
In-Reply-To: <D181DDABABE57E4DB72FEE00331478644F42F0@EALPO1.ukbroadband.com>
X-MAIL-FROM: <avitkovsky@emea.att.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansible
That's what came to my mind when I first heard about quantum entanglement j=
ust to learn that there's really small chance we could ever use it for comm=
unication
adam
-----Original Message-----
From: Leigh Porter [mailto:leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com]=20
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 2:20 PM
To: Vitkovsky, Adam; Aled Morris; Eugen Leitl
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: RE: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vitkovsky, Adam [mailto:avitkovsky@emea.att.com]
> Sent: 23 March 2012 12:57
> To: Aled Morris; Eugen Leitl
> Cc: NANOG list
> Subject: RE: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by
> 60ms
>=20
> That is why there's this neutrinos project It's not faster than the
> speed of light though it can shoot through the Earth and no cables cost
> involved
>=20
> So far the speed is 0.1 bit per sec
>=20
> Can't wait for the neutrino SFPs :)
>=20
> adam
>=20
Nooo, we just need Interocitors!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interocitor
---
Leigh
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
