[151510] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Mar 23 09:51:13 2012

To: Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:53:45 +0100."
 <20120323115345.GF9891@leitl.org>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 09:47:44 -0400
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

--==_Exmh_1332510464_1929P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:53:45 +0100, Eugen Leitl said:
> http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/122989-1-5-billion-the-cost-of-cutting-london-toyko-latency-by-60ms

Lower latency is good...

> The massive drop in latency is expected to supercharge algorithmic stock
> market trading, where a difference of a few milliseconds can gain (or lose)
> millions of dollars.

But it should be illegal to run a stock market that volatile.  This can't end well.


--==_Exmh_1332510464_1929P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
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=Fq/O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1332510464_1929P--



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post