[149738] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leigh Porter)
Tue Feb 14 10:52:53 2012
From: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
To: Brandon Kim <brandon.kim@brandontek.com>, "blake@pfankuch.me"
<blake@pfankuch.me>, "jay@miscreant.org" <jay@miscreant.org>,
"jra@baylink.com" <jra@baylink.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:53:43 +0000
In-Reply-To: <BLU158-W51472FFDC4763D01968E7FDC7C0@phx.gbl>
Cc: nanog group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brandon Kim [mailto:brandon.kim@brandontek.com]
> Sent: 14 February 2012 15:51
> To: blake@pfankuch.me; jay@miscreant.org; jra@baylink.com
> Cc: nanog group
> Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow
>=20
>=20
> I've been using 5.8 with no problems thus far. As for the CLI, yes it
> is CLUNKY.
>=20
> But they are completely revamping it, it will be very similar to Cisco
> in the near future...
Why do people like to base their CLIs on the really rather awful Cisco sty=
le interface rather than something with some more structure like Juniper?
--
Leigh Porter
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
