[149743] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Blake Pfankuch)
Tue Feb 14 17:40:29 2012

From: Blake Pfankuch <blake@pfankuch.me>
To: Brandon Kim <brandon.kim@brandontek.com>, "leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com"
 <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>, "jay@miscreant.org" <jay@miscreant.org>,
 "jra@baylink.com" <jra@baylink.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:39:07 +0000
In-Reply-To: <BLU158-W40B5CECC4C1F25E8B5CC44DC7C0@phx.gbl>
Cc: nanog group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

I would be happy if it was Juniper or Cisco ish.  Right now it's just total=
 crap :)

From: brandon.j.kim@live.com [mailto:brandon.j.kim@live.com] On Behalf Of B=
randon Kim
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:14 AM
To: leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com; Blake Pfankuch; jay@miscreant.org; jra@ba=
ylink.com
Cc: nanog group
Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow

Never messed around with Juniper....



> From: leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com<mailto:leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
> To: brandon.kim@brandontek.com<mailto:brandon.kim@brandontek.com>; blake@=
pfankuch.me<mailto:blake@pfankuch.me>; jay@miscreant.org<mailto:jay@miscrea=
nt.org>; jra@baylink.com<mailto:jra@baylink.com>
> CC: nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org>
> Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:53:43 +0000
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brandon Kim [mailto:brandon.kim@brandontek.com]<mailto:[mailto:br=
andon.kim@brandontek.com]>
> > Sent: 14 February 2012 15:51
> > To: blake@pfankuch.me<mailto:blake@pfankuch.me>; jay@miscreant.org<mail=
to:jay@miscreant.org>; jra@baylink.com<mailto:jra@baylink.com>
> > Cc: nanog group
> > Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow
> >
> >
> > I've been using 5.8 with no problems thus far. As for the CLI, yes it
> > is CLUNKY.
> >
> > But they are completely revamping it, it will be very similar to Cisco
> > in the near future...
>
> Why do people like to base their CLIs on the really rather awful Cisco st=
yle interface rather than something with some more structure like Juniper?
>
>
> --
> Leigh Porter
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post