[149586] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 2012.02.08 NANOG54 day 3 morning session notes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Wed Feb 8 16:17:31 2012
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:16:33 -0500 (EST)
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAEmG1=odct+tn66dX7AF0-YE0WZp3BVvQpGeXgtoGNLG-uPHeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthew Petach" <mpetach@netflight.com>
> I've posted my notes from this morning's session
> at
>
> http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2012.02.08-nanog54-morning-session.txt
>
> I wonder if perhaps we don't keep asking for NEBS
> compliance just because we don't have another
> easy acronym to put on the RFQs that represents
> what *our* industry needs, vs the telco industry?
Well, there is a difference between NEBS Compliant (which lots of people
make, and lots can use) and NEBS Certified (which entails paying money to
Telcordia, I think, and probably requires 23" racking, which most of us
don't care about...
Cheers,
-- jr 'at least, there used to be' a
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
