[149585] in North American Network Operators' Group
2012.02.08 NANOG54 day 3 morning session notes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Petach)
Wed Feb 8 15:47:25 2012
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 12:46:33 -0800
From: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I've posted my notes from this morning's session
at
http://kestrel3.netflight.com/2012.02.08-nanog54-morning-session.txt
I wonder if perhaps we don't keep asking for NEBS
compliance just because we don't have another
easy acronym to put on the RFQs that represents
what *our* industry needs, vs the telco industry?
Thanks again for another awesome NANOG!
Matt
