[148678] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Megaupload.com seized
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tei)
Fri Jan 20 06:43:46 2012
In-Reply-To: <CD20CE46-3667-4DF5-9311-9FCAE54B38F6@gmail.com>
From: Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:42:35 +0100
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 20 January 2012 12:14, Alec Muffett <alec.muffett@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 20 Jan 2012, at 11:00, Tei wrote:
>
>> Fileshares can organize thenselves in sites based on a forum software
>> that is private by default (open with registration), then share some
>> "information" file that include the url to the files hosted, and the
>> key to unencrypt these files, and some metadata. A special desktop
>> program* would load that information file, and start the http
>> download.
>
>
> At the risk of kicking over old ground, there are a bunch of privacy solu=
tions like this; possibly the most complete attempt (in terms of attempted =
privacy and distribution) is Freenet:
>
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://freenetproject.org/whatis.html
>
> ...but it's slow; then there's Tahoe-LAFS - a decentralised filesystem:
>
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs
>
> ...but it's slow; then there are connection anonymisation tools like I2P =
and Tor, but - wonderful as they are - they're slow.
>
> Can you see a pattern developing that would be relevant to the downloader=
of 700Mb+ AVIs? :-)
>
> It would be great to speed them through wider adoption, but until then...
>
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0-a
>
These services are not needed yet. But is good that are under study,
in case changes in laws or balance of power make it needed.
For now, I think people will continue using HTTP download/stream
movies and tv series.
Perhaps countries where the 3 strikes legislation is aprobed will make
one of these systems necesary. But I think speed is a important
factor, and no slow system will suceed.
--=20
--
=E2=84=B1in del =E2=84=B3ensaje.
