[147480] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Sad IPv4 story?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vitkovsky, Adam)
Mon Dec 12 04:18:33 2011
From: "Vitkovsky, Adam" <avitkovsky@emea.att.com>
To: Eric Parsonage <eric@eparsonage.com>, "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu"
<Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:17:08 +0100
In-Reply-To: <3ADD5AAC-C95A-48CD-8880-F44E799C8A25@eparsonage.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> and models that doesn't take "we may not get IPv4 space" into account and=
have
> a contingency plan for that *deserves* to be soundly mocked and ridiculed=
in
> public.
That's right
However the original post was concerning a fresh new ISP that can't run the=
ir business the way they would like
Maybe they'd like to build an mpls core which right now is not possible wit=
h only ipv6 at hand
I'd like to see the business model to build an mpls network with all the fe=
atures we're used to -but solely on ipv6 -I guess the plan would be let's w=
ait a couple years till it gets implemented and mature enough
