[147187] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP addresses are now assets
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Mon Dec 5 05:20:48 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <30AF119C-F83E-469B-8E49-73DF7330D773@firsthand.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 02:17:08 -0800
To: "cdel.firsthand.net" <cdel@firsthand.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.orglist" <nanog@nanog.org>,
"jcurran@arin.net" <jcurran@arin.net>,
"bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com" <bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Extra and unnecessary characters do not a correct word make.
Owen
On Dec 5, 2011, at 12:27 AM, cdel.firsthand.net wrote:
> The British have been using the correct six character word length for =
humour ad memoriam.=20
>=20
>=20
> Christian de Larrinaga
>=20
>=20
> On 4 Dec 2011, at 15:15, Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 18:18, David Barak <thegameiam@yahoo.com> =
wrote:
>>=20
>>> Should the HAC be expected to manage the transition to HumorV6?
>>>=20
>>=20
>> I am not that familiar with Humorv6. Has Hv6 had sufficient
>> operational input, or is it based on a philosophically pure
>> redesign of humor making it theoretically funny, but
>> in practice most of the humor falls flat. Does it require a
>> redesign of the existing infrastructure (i.e. comedy clubs)
>> in order to get the joke? And, of course, is the British
>> implementation of HumourV6 compatible the American
>> implementation of HumorV6?
>>=20
>> Gary
