[147186] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP addresses are now assets
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (cdel.firsthand.net)
Mon Dec 5 03:29:10 2011
In-Reply-To: <CAMfXtQx2q1MNKT29ggTuaD7QBoKbkmp05F7TJJnW37WusSjo=Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: "cdel.firsthand.net" <cdel@firsthand.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:27:48 +0000
To: Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com>
Cc: "jcurran@arin.net" <jcurran@arin.net>,
"nanog@nanog.orglist" <nanog@nanog.org>,
"bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com" <bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
The British have been using the correct six character word length for humour=
ad memoriam.=20
Christian de Larrinaga
On 4 Dec 2011, at 15:15, Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 18:18, David Barak <thegameiam@yahoo.com> wrote:
>=20
>> Should the HAC be expected to manage the transition to HumorV6?
>>=20
>=20
> I am not that familiar with Humorv6. Has Hv6 had sufficient
> operational input, or is it based on a philosophically pure
> redesign of humor making it theoretically funny, but
> in practice most of the humor falls flat. Does it require a
> redesign of the existing infrastructure (i.e. comedy clubs)
> in order to get the joke? And, of course, is the British
> implementation of HumourV6 compatible the American
> implementation of HumorV6?
>=20
> Gary
