[147107] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: bgp update destroying transit on redback routers ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alexandre Snarskii)
Fri Dec 2 09:36:56 2011
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 18:35:54 +0400
From: Alexandre Snarskii <snar@snar.spb.ru>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <0ED867EB33AB2B45AAB470D5A64CDBF6181C25624E@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 04:56:43PM -0500, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Let me take it over from now on, I'm the IP Routing/MPLS Product Manager
> at Ericsson responsible for all routing protocols.
> There's nothing wrong in checking ASN in AGGREGATOR, we don't really want
> see ASN 0 anywhere, that's how draft-wkumari-idr-as0 (draft-ietf-idr-as0-00)
> came into the worlds.
This draft says that
If a BGP speaker receives a route which has an AS number of zero in the
AS_PATH (or AS4_PATH) attribute, it SHOULD be logged and treated as a
WITHDRAW. This same behavior applies to routes containing zero as the
Aggregator or AS4 Aggregator.
but observed behaviour was more like following:
If a BGP speaker receives [bad route] it MUST close session immediately
with NOTIFICATION Error Code 'Update Message Error' and subcode 'Error with
optional attribute'.
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
But, in practice, there is.