[147099] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP addresses are now assets
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joly MacFie)
Fri Dec 2 07:59:30 2011
In-Reply-To: <EB76C778-6751-404A-A9B6-3ECA8251BF18@arin.net>
From: Joly MacFie <joly@punkcast.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 07:57:26 -0500
To: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
Cc: "Michael R. Wayne" <wayne@staff.msen.com>, NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi John,
I'm sorry to be thick, but can you explain "right of visibility to the
public portion of registrations" a little further?.
Under what circumstances might ARIN deny approval?
j
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:42 AM, John Curran <jcurran@arin.net> wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2011, at 2:48 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
>
> > Would it be correct to summarize the ARIN position as "It's murkier than
> Cerner
> > makes it out to be, and some lawyers are gonna get stinking filthy rich
> > litigating this one"?
>
> It's pretty simple: you can write a contract to transfer IP
> addresses in accordance with policy, and we are now seeing
> most parties come to us in advance either to prequalify or
> make the sale conditional on approval.
>
> FYI,
> /John
>
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> ARIN
>
>
>
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
--------------------------------------------------------------
-
