[146969] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Eisenberg)
Tue Nov 29 12:07:07 2011
From: Nathan Eisenberg <nathan@atlasnetworks.us>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 17:06:04 +0000
In-Reply-To: <DEBECAC9A6D5224D95078F3CDC36225809C431@TKMNAEXCH.thyssenna.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> Note that /127 is strongly discouraged in RFC5375 and RFC3627. 3627
> suggests using /112 for router links, or /126 at the very most.
Of potential interest, since you bring up RFC3627, is the following draft, =
and RFC6164:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-george-6man-3627-historic-01
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6164
Nathan Eisenberg
