[146968] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (McCall, Gabriel)
Tue Nov 29 12:01:52 2011
From: "McCall, Gabriel" <Gabriel.McCall@thyssenkrupp.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, "Brzozowski, John"
<John_Brzozowski@Cable.Comcast.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:00:42 -0500
In-Reply-To: <8BE79149-2378-4B8D-AB4D-E2ECB6CF3E0E@cisco.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Note that /127 is strongly discouraged in RFC5375 and RFC3627. 3627 suggest=
s using /112 for router links, or /126 at the very most.
-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Baker [mailto:fred@cisco.com]=20
...
I see no reason you couldn't use a /127 prefix if the link was point to poi=
nt.
...=20
