[146268] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: where was my white knight....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Tue Nov 8 13:54:14 2011
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 18:54:02 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
In-Reply-To: <3FF79D55-9167-4969-B612-A49666A98A1D@arbor.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 06:25:36PM +0000, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
> On Nov 9, 2011, at 1:22 AM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
>
> > Validation storm-control is something which must be accounted for in SIDR/DANE architecture, implementation, and deployment. But at the end of the day, vendors are still responsible for their own code.
>
> To be clear, I was alluding to some discussion centering around DANE or a DANE-like mechanism to handle SIDR-type route validation. Recursive dependencies make this a non-starter, IMHO.
>
well... your still stuck w/ knowing where your CA is...
/bill
