[145760] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Wed Oct 19 13:49:34 2011
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <A2D08A2C-4E08-41A9-90E2-9162C7186698@prolocation.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:48:37 -0400
To: Raymond Dijkxhoorn <raymond@prolocation.net>
Cc: NANOG Mailing List <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Oct 19, 2011, at 3:00 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> Dont mix up peering and transit connections!
I've nearly given up on this. I've heard many a small provider say they =
are "Peering" with level3 when they mean "we are buying transit from =
Level3".
Many people equate having BGP up with them to mean something else.
- Jared=
