[145753] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Woodcock)
Wed Oct 19 12:54:20 2011

From: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E9E7236.5000403@stluke.com.ph>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:53:15 -0700
To: Nathanael C. Cariaga <nccariaga@stluke.com.ph>
Cc: NANOG Mailing List <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


On Oct 18, 2011, at 11:46 PM, Nathanael C. Cariaga wrote:
> Is it safe to conclude that the web hosting provider's available =
routes would would depend on the peers who are advertising their AS / =
network?  (i.e if web hosting provider claims that they are peering with =
telco a, b, c but as seen from a third party looking glass, only C is =
seen advertising the web hosting provider network that would mean web =
hosting provider is effectively utilizing c as their upstream??)

Modulo a lot of nit-picking caveats, this would indicate that they are =
purchasing transit from C, while they may or may not be peering with A =
and B.  If a customer of A or B is able to reach them in a single =
AS-hop, but A and B are not advertising a route to C to looking-glasses =
or their own peers or transit providers, then A and B are peers, but not =
transit providers, to the web host.

> I would need to determine the web hosting provider who has the most =
number of peers and most number of transit providers?

A large number of transit providers has been shown, both theoretically =
and experimentally, to _decrease_ uptime, because of greater =
route-convergence times when there are more parallel paths to a =
destination.  Your mileage may vary, but the optimum number is usually =
somewhere around three transit providers.  The number of peers, though, =
and more to the point, the number of routes acquired through peering, is =
an excellent measure of how large and how long an ISP (in this case a =
web-hoster) has been in business.  That shouldn't be your only measure =
of quality, however.  It may be that reliability of power, competence of =
remote-hands, and flexibility to accommodate your needs are more =
important than how the packets get delivered.

                                -Bill




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
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=3Dzi6u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post