[145670] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [routing-wg] The Cidr Report

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Sat Oct 15 15:30:43 2011

Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 12:29:06 -0700
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <6FBC4D01-2BAD-4837-AC2E-EA0DA63B1BBD@apnic.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

> From what I learned at the latest NANOG it's very clear that nobody
> reads this any more.

some read it.  we are the frustrated ones.

no one seems to act on it.

> Is there any good reason to persist in spamming the nanog list with
> this report?

not clear, sad to say.

i really think that the only way to reduce fragging is filtering.  maybe
a bgp blackhole feed for frags for which there are covering prefixes?

randy


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post