[145189] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cisco 7600 PFC3B(XL) and IPv6 packets with fragmentation header
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Fri Sep 30 12:31:24 2011
In-Reply-To: <4E85E7B3.7050001@foobar.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:31:15 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
> Of course, if you wanted a 10g capable service provider router and didn't
> want an asr9k, they were pushing the 7600 because the 6500 is a switch an=
d
> the 7600 is a router and the two are totally different, no really you've
> gotta believe it. =A0But at least the rsp720 could handle ipv6 fragments =
better.
>
if I turn my head to the side I can almost believe you.
