[145188] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cisco 7600 PFC3B(XL) and IPv6 packets with fragmentation header
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Fri Sep 30 12:02:45 2011
X-Envelope-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:00:51 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1109301736220.98791@mignon.ki.iif.hu>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 30/09/2011 16:38, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
> They are pushing sup2T - however more for enterprise ip layer (6500 series).
they are now, yes. But until the sup2t started becoming available a couple
of weeks ago the only option for the 6500 was a sup720. You're right that
this was only pushed on the enterprise market.
Of course, if you wanted a 10g capable service provider router and didn't
want an asr9k, they were pushing the 7600 because the 6500 is a switch and
the 7600 is a router and the two are totally different, no really you've
gotta believe it. But at least the rsp720 could handle ipv6 fragments better.
Nick
