[144995] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP visibility for /24 End User Allocation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Swafford)
Fri Sep 23 16:17:12 2011
In-Reply-To: <730AF3879A3A3844B3FB5A881A3DFBC8D0EEC08A68@VA3DIAXVS091.RED001.local>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:15:47 -0400
From: David Swafford <david@davidswafford.com>
To: Eric Germann <egermann@limanews.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Shouldn't be an issue. We're advertising 4 x \24s and using much more BW.
David.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Eric Germann <egermann@limanews.com> wrote=
:
> Long time on-again-off-again lurker.
>
> Looking to multihome in the most efficient mode.
>
> Our two upstreams are AS11530 (Embarq) and AS10796 (Time Warner). =A0Dive=
rse routed fiber from each at 10Mbps.
>
> Our traffic profile is highly asymmetric as a consumer of bandwidth (12-1=
5Mbps average inbound aggregate, 2-3Mbps aggregate very bursty outbound).
>
> Years ago when I tinkered with BGP there were substantial issues with get=
ting any prefix too small through filters to see the "greater Internet" (II=
RC it was a /19 at that time).
>
> Given we really could justify a /24 realistically, what is the current st=
atus of filtering in terms of having that /24 get to the "vast majority" of=
the Internet given the two providers in question?
>
> Thanks for any advice in advance.
>
> EKG
>
>
