[144993] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP visibility for /24 End User Allocation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Carpenter)
Fri Sep 23 14:56:59 2011
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 14:56:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Randy Carpenter <rcarpen@network1.net>
To: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us>
In-Reply-To: <4E7CD125.2000709@rollernet.us>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
We have routed a couple of /24s via BGP for a long time. 10+ years for one of them. We have never had any issues. If you get an End-User assignment from ARIN, it is probably even easier than getting providers to route a /24 out of another provider's space.
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President - IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (800)578-6381, Opt. 1
----
----- Original Message -----
> On 9/23/11 11:29 AM, Eric Germann wrote:
> > Long time on-again-off-again lurker.
> >
> > Looking to multihome in the most efficient mode.
> >
> > Our two upstreams are AS11530 (Embarq) and AS10796 (Time Warner).
> > Diverse routed fiber from each at 10Mbps.
> >
> > Our traffic profile is highly asymmetric as a consumer of bandwidth
> > (12-15Mbps average inbound aggregate, 2-3Mbps aggregate very
> > bursty outbound).
> >
> > Years ago when I tinkered with BGP there were substantial issues
> > with getting any prefix too small through filters to see the
> > "greater Internet" (IIRC it was a /19 at that time).
> >
> > Given we really could justify a /24 realistically, what is the
> > current status of filtering in terms of having that /24 get to the
> > "vast majority" of the Internet given the two providers in
> > question?
> >
> > Thanks for any advice in advance.
> >
>
> A /24 is has been the gold standard for a while, you shouldn't have
> any
> problems.
>
> ~Seth
>
>
>
