[144598] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ouch..
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leigh Porter)
Thu Sep 15 02:36:37 2011
From: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
To: Mark Gauvin <MGauvin@dryden.ca>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:36:42 +0000
In-Reply-To: <D6189AA0-DCE7-4F0A-A272-C525A8C59140@dryden.ca>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I'm looking forward to the awful experience of NAT444 promoting IPv6.
--=20
Leigh Porter
On 15 Sep 2011, at 00:37, "Mark Gauvin" <MGauvin@dryden.ca> wrote:
> Nat444 or frontal labotomy hmm let's see at least with the second I =20
> would still be able to make a living as a micro soft network admin;)
>=20
> Sent from my iPhone
>=20
> On 2011-09-14, at 6:07 PM, "James Jones" <james@freedomnet.co.nz> wrote:=
>=20
>> On 9/14/11 2:46 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>>> In a message written on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:24:25AM +1200, Don =20=
>>> Gould wrote:
>>>> How many of you have sat and thought about the merit of this web =20
>>>> site?
>>> Ok, I'll take a swing at your list...
>>>=20
>>>> * Does Juniper break promises?
>>> Yes.
>>>=20
>>>> * Does Cisco break them?
>>> Yes.
>>>=20
>>>> * What bad things and experiences have you had with Cisco, Juniper?
>>> It might take me several days, and many pages to compile that list.
>>>=20
>>>> * What is the best technology for each company?
>>> Cisco: The AGS+ was ahead of its time.
>>> Jiniper: The Olive is quite nifty.
>>>=20
>>>> * Did you know that Cisco has a 100Gb solution?
>>> Yes, but I can't afford it.
>>>=20
>>> Now, with that out of the way, how much does everyone else hate =20
>>> even the
>>> thought of NAT444?
>>>=20
>>> :) :) :)
>>>=20
>>=20
>> Just the thought of NAT444 makes my stomach turn.
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>=20
>=20
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email=20
> ______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email=20
______________________________________________________________________
