[144595] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ouch..
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James Jones)
Wed Sep 14 19:11:47 2011
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:08:57 -0700
From: James Jones <james@freedomnet.co.nz>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20110914214651.GA64938@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 9/14/11 2:46 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:24:25AM +1200, Don Gould wrote:
>> How many of you have sat and thought about the merit of this web site?
> Ok, I'll take a swing at your list...
>
>> * Does Juniper break promises?
> Yes.
>
>> * Does Cisco break them?
> Yes.
>
>> * What bad things and experiences have you had with Cisco, Juniper?
> It might take me several days, and many pages to compile that list.
>
>> * What is the best technology for each company?
> Cisco: The AGS+ was ahead of its time.
> Jiniper: The Olive is quite nifty.
>
>> * Did you know that Cisco has a 100Gb solution?
> Yes, but I can't afford it.
>
> Now, with that out of the way, how much does everyone else hate even the
> thought of NAT444?
>
> :) :) :)
>
Just the thought of NAT444 makes my stomach turn.
