[144578] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ouch..
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James Jones)
Wed Sep 14 11:03:01 2011
In-Reply-To: <D181DDABABE57E4DB72FEE00331478643BF621@EALPO1.ukbroadband.com>
From: James Jones <james@freedomnet.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:00:18 -0700
To: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>, Always Learning <nanog@u61.u22.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Funny they forget to mention that Cisco doesn't have 100g any where.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 14, 2011, at 7:41 AM, Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com> wro=
te:
>=20
>=20
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Always Learning [mailto:nanog@u61.u22.net]
>> Sent: 14 September 2011 14:39
>> To: N. Max Pierson
>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: ouch..
>>=20
>>=20
>> On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 08:33 -0500, N. Max Pierson wrote:
>>=20
>>> Either way, it's pathetic. If someone is going to slander in the
>>> fashion the site has done, they should at least put a contact form
>>> somewhere for some feedback :)
>>=20
>> Slander means falsehood. Cisco tells lies ?
>>=20
>>=20
>> --
>> With best regards,
>>=20
>> Paul.
>> England,
>> EU.
>=20
>=20
> Lies? So who has 100G MX series cards then..?
>=20
> --
> Leigh
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email=20
> ______________________________________________________________________
>=20
