[144566] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: ouch..
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chuck Church)
Wed Sep 14 08:38:34 2011
From: "Chuck Church" <chuckchurch@gmail.com>
To: "'Erik Bais'" <ebais@a2b-internet.com>,
<nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <00a601cc72d5$3dc653b0$b952fb10$@com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:37:48 -0400
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
-----Original Message-----
>From: Erik Bais [mailto:ebais@a2b-internet.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 7:56 AM
>To: 'Frank Habicht'; nanog@nanog.org
>Subject: RE: ouch..
>Personally I think this is a pathetic action from Cisco, however I'm not
>surprised by them doing it ...
>Regards,
>Erik Bais
Does seem odd that Cisco would use Go Daddy. My first thought was a
disgruntled (ex) Juniper Employee. Then again, Juniper did bash Cisco in
its cartoon strips all those years. Payback???
