[144429] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Why are we still using the CA model? (Re: Microsoft deems all
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Sun Sep 11 22:09:28 2011
In-Reply-To: <CAAAas8Fua4EbjwKs_wkrcyr1Y6TqXQYNOAC5VGANKmh3hNSfUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 22:08:45 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Mike Jones <mike@mikejones.in>
Cc: NANOG mailing list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Mike Jones <mike@mikejones.in> wrote:
> EV certificates have a
> different status and probably still need the CA model
what's the real benefit of an EV cert? (to the service owner, not the
CA, the CA benefit is pretty clearly $$)
-chris
(I've never seen the value in EV or even DV certs really... so I'm
actually curious what the value other see in them is)
