[144424] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Why are we still using the CA model? (Re: Microsoft deems all
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Aaron C. de Bruyn)
Sun Sep 11 19:11:37 2011
In-Reply-To: <151523.1315781561@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: "Aaron C. de Bruyn" <aaron@heyaaron.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:10:14 -0700
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: NANOG mailing list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Neither at the moment--but it's close.
-A
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 15:52, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:20:51 PDT, "Aaron C. de Bruyn" said:
>> I'm pretty fond of the idea proposed by gpgAuth.One key to rule them
>> all (and one password) combined with the client verifying the
>> server.It's still in its infancy, but it works.
>
> Yes, but it needs to be something that either (a) Joe Sixpack never
> sees, or (b) Joe Sixpack actually understands. =C2=A0Are either of those
> true?
>
