[144384] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: NAT444 or ?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dobbins, Roland)
Sat Sep 10 02:44:02 2011

From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
To: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 06:43:19 +0000
In-Reply-To: <201109101411.19948.mtinka@globaltransit.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On Sep 10, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:

> What we've seen also, with some mobile carriers, is that if you ask them =
to consider distributed IP architectures, they/you quickly realize that IP =
routing isn't really their core business or skill.

Concur.  Many/most have essentially become 'accidental ISPs' through the ri=
se in popularity of iDevices, and some at least are beginning to realize th=
is and to staff and re-engineer accordingly.  It takes time, though.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

		The basis of optimism is sheer terror.

			  -- Oscar Wilde



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post