[144260] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NAT444 or ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Wed Sep 7 06:17:08 2011
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:16:28 +0200
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
In-Reply-To: <D181DDABABE57E4DB72FEE00331478643BA795@EALPO1.ukbroadband.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> I'm going to have to deploy NAT444 with dual-stack real soon now.
you may want to review the presentations from last week's apnic meeting
in busan. real mesurements. sufficiently scary that people who were
heavily pushing nat444 for the last two years suddenly started to say
"it was not me who pushed nat444, it was him!" as if none of us had a
memory.
randy
