[144257] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NAT444 or ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tore Anderson)
Wed Sep 7 04:14:51 2011
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:13:35 +0200
From: Tore Anderson <tore.anderson@redpill-linpro.com>
To: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <86E509F1-FD44-46EE-A6A3-DC83A46BDD60@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
* Arturo Servin
> NAT444 alone is not enough.
>
> You will need to deploy it along with 6rd or DS-lite.
In a typical DS-Lite deployment you won't be using NAT444. One of the
key advantages of DS-Lite (and A+P, I believe) is that there's only one
level of NAT between the end user and the public internet.
--
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com
