[144184] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (jim deleskie)
Sun Sep 4 15:30:10 2011
In-Reply-To: <m2sjocyyu8.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 16:29:44 -0300
From: jim deleskie <deleskie@gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Because routing to peers as a policy instead of customer as a matter
of policy, outside of corner cases make logical sence. While many
providers aren;t good at making money it is fact the purpose of the
ventures. If I route to a customer I get paid for it. If I send it
to a peer I do not.
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>> While I can think of some corner cases for this, ie you have a
>> satellite down link from one provider and fiber to anther. =A0I expect
>> this is not the norm for most networks/customers.
>
> what is it you do not understand about "more than one of the world's
> largest providers?" =A0not in corner cases, but as core policy.
>
> randy
>
