[144183] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jennifer Rexford)
Sun Sep 4 15:27:41 2011
From: Jennifer Rexford <jrex@CS.Princeton.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <m2ty8syywg.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 15:27:07 -0400
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Randy,
Yes, as the brief write-up says, the group will make "recommendations =
regarding the adoption" (e.g., suggesting effective strategies for =
incremental deployment) of "procedures and protocols based on existing =
work" (e.g., RPKI, BGP-SEC, etc.). In any case, if our current wording =
is unclear, we can easily revise it to clarify our goals.
-- Jen
On Sep 4, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> As one of the co-chairs of this working group, I'd like to chime in =
to
>> clarify the purpose of this group. Our goal is to assemble a group =
of
>> vendors and operators (not "publish or perish" academics) to discuss =
and
>> recommend effective strategies for incremental deployment of security
>> solutions for BGP (e.g., such as the ongoing RPKI and BGP-SEC work). =
It
>> is not to design new security protocols or to "write policy and
>> procedures for operators"
>=20
> This Working Group will recommend the framework for an industry
> agreement regarding the adoption of secure routing procedures and
> protocols based on existing work in industry and research. The
> framework will include specific technical procedures and protocols. =
The
> framework will be proposed in a way suitable for opt-in by large
> Internet Service Providers...
>=20
> randy
