[144026] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Sat Aug 27 13:57:19 2011
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <6450.1314414658@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 13:56:35 -0400
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Aug 26, 2011, at 11:10 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 21:32:00 EDT, "Patrick W. Gilmore" said:
>> Next time Cogent de-peers someone, customers do not care who was =
being
>> more reasonable. They care that their links are broken.
>=20
> Wouldn't that mostly affect people who are silly enough to single-home =
to a Tier-1 that
> gets involved in a peering dispute?
Which $PROBLEM does not affect only those who are "silly enough" to not =
put mitigation tools for $PROBLEM?
And the customers still don't care. They just care _that_ it affected =
them - at least during the problem. Although one can hope they care =
enough to change their behavior afterward.
--=20
TTFN,
patrick
