[144018] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Aug 26 23:14:14 2011
To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 Aug 2011 21:32:00 EDT."
<1EB20D0B-9DB1-476D-A793-275E0839E21A@ianai.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 23:10:58 -0400
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1314414658_5160P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 21:32:00 EDT, "Patrick W. Gilmore" said:
> Next time Cogent de-peers someone, customers do not care who was being
> more reasonable. They care that their links are broken.
Wouldn't that mostly affect people who are silly enough to single-home to a Tier-1 that
gets involved in a peering dispute?
--==_Exmh_1314414658_5160P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFOWGBBcC3lWbTT17ARAmRrAKDz2/y29td2xxTRDupYij+JdzTxcQCeJFSN
X6m+R3K7KJoA8MfJt1ZFtcA=
=1xkN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1314414658_5160P--
