[143896] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Denis Spirin)
Sun Aug 21 06:41:27 2011
In-Reply-To: <001901cc5fdf$0b7fc390$227f4ab0$@com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 12:40:52 +0200
From: Denis Spirin <noc@link-telecom.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi Erik,
The RIPE DB shows clear Internap have NO permission to route our networks as
the direct uplink. Am I wrong?
2011/8/21 Erik Bais <ebais@a2b-internet.com>
> Hi Denis,
>
> If Portnap doesn't / won't assist in this matter, you can send an abuse
> message to both Tinet and NTT and have them reject the prefixes on their
> ingress port.
>
> They will probably only do that in case you have your AS record and route
> objects correctly documented and can actually provide the proof they
> require
> to do so.
>
> Regards,
> Erik
>
>
>
