[143538] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Experience with Juniper MX-80s
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brian Keefer)
Thu Aug 11 19:00:24 2011
From: Brian Keefer <chort@smtps.net>
In-Reply-To: <20110811134356.1c673f90@concur.batblue.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:59:30 -0700
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>, bpasdar@batblue.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Aug 11, 2011, at 6:43 AM, Babak Pasdar wrote:
> Hello NANOG Group,
>=20
> I am curious if anyone has any experiences positive or negative with =
Juniper MX-80s. Our recent experience with Juniper has not been great =
both in terms of new product offerings (SRX) and software bugs in the =
recent revs of Junos for the MX platform. I want to know if the MX-80 =
functions as advertised and in specific can properly handle two full =
IPv4 and IPv6 BGP feeds=20
I'm curious about these too. Specifically, does anyone have =
experience/thoughts on the anti-DDoS features? I know there are =
scenarios it wouldn't begin to address, but are they worth spending time =
to fiddle with? Also, is anyone taking JFlow off of them? We're trying =
to figure out how much we could sample while doing about 900Mbps. I'm =
not sure what our PPS looks like off the top of my head.
TIA.
--
chort
