[143514] in North American Network Operators' Group
Experience with Juniper MX-80s
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Babak Pasdar)
Thu Aug 11 09:44:35 2011
From: "Babak Pasdar" <bpasdar@batblue.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:43:56 -0400
Reply-To: bpasdar@batblue.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hello NANOG Group,
I am curious if anyone has any experiences positive or negative with Jun=
iper MX-80s. Our recent experience with Juniper has not been great both=
in terms of new product offerings (SRX) and software bugs in the recent=
revs of Junos for the MX platform. I want to know if the MX-80 functio=
ns as advertised and in specific can properly handle two full IPv4 and I=
Pv6 BGP feeds=20
Thanks in advance,
Babak=20
--
Babak Pasdar
President & CEO | Certified Ethical Hacker
Bat Blue Corporation | Integrity . Privacy . Availability . Performance
(p) 212.461.3322 x3005 | (f) 212.584.9999 | (w) www.BatBlue.com
Bat Blue is proud to be the Official WiFi Provider for ESPN's X Games
Bat Blue's AS: 25885 | BGP Policy | Peering Policy
Receive Bat Blue's Daily Security Intelligence Report
Bat Blue's Legal Notice
