[143223] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Wed Aug 3 04:29:54 2011
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 10:28:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <364F1DA6-861A-46B8-95F4-5B9B0B62EF35@delong.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Europe is a little odd in that way, especially DE and NO in that there
> seems to be this weird FUD running around claiming that static addresses
> are in some way more antithetical to privacy.
Yes, I agree. I know people who choose provider based on the availability
of static addresses, I know very few who avoid static address ISPs because
of this fact.
FUD indeed.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
