[143259] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Thu Aug 4 15:03:32 2011
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 11:24:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <275FEA2949B48341A3B46F424B613D857CC7@WDC-MX.photon.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jamie Bowden" <jamie@photon.com>
> Oh please, you know practical, operational, and security concerns mean
> nothing next to the beauty and purity of the perfect network protocol
> design.
I was just replying to Dave, who reminded me that IPv6 is not v4 with
bigger addresses, that I thought that was the Worst Imaginable Approach.
:-)
Cheers
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
