[142720] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Ferguson)
Tue Jul 12 11:12:09 2011
In-Reply-To: <m28vs335q4.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 08:04:17 -0700
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>>> Thankfully, the current test has been a success. =A0We are going to
>>> stay in
>> Hooray for testing in production.
>
> we are not dealing with stupid or inexperienced people here. =A0i assume
> they tested.
>
> but, like our beloved vendors, they also have a hard time reproducing
> the real network in the lab, so we end up debugging it for them. =A0otoh,
> i am willing to wager that in a few weeks, we will not see bugs in the
> list. =A0sure can't say the same for the vendors.
>
Please -- give it a rest.
And let's take this thread to it's ultimate conclusion, please.
- ferg
--=20
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
=A0Engineering Architecture for the Internet
=A0fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
=A0ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
