[142719] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Spam?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Thomas Donnelly)
Tue Jul 12 11:08:34 2011
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:02:00 -0500
From: "Thomas Donnelly" <tad1214@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANQy6FYGSQ=Yw3fAZ=PUQdycOkZwojcsAQ5zbt2Y+P2kmbUx-g@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I received no spam, and had I received 2 pieces, it may have been slightly
irritating.
What is irritating is the sheer number of people complaining about it. Can
we stop please? I think they get it.
-=Tom
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:58:42 -0500, Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>
>>> New location means we now get spam on Nanog?
>>
>> no extra charge :)
>>
>> i have lived through maintaing decades of mailing lists and do not envy
>> the nanog mailing list crew and glen over at amsl.
>>
>> thanks for the hard work, folk.
>>
>
> Let's work harder -- seriously, MailMan seemed to be working fine. ~:-/
>
> - ferg
>
>
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
