[142145] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cogent depeers ESnet
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert Bonomi)
Sun Jun 19 04:15:34 2011
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 03:15:09 -0500 (CDT)
From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=D8SCPUtAThhRf0kkk1SQOc+a+rQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi.com@nanog.org Sun Jun 19 01:46:06 2011
> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 23:44:28 -0700
> Subject: Re: Cogent depeers ESnet
> From: "George B." <georgeb@gmail.com>
> To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
> Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
>
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> > Slightly old news, but it looks like Cogent depeered ESnet last week:
> >
> >>
> >> http://www.es.net/news-and-publications/esnet-news/2011/important-statu
> >> s-announcement-regarding-cogent-connectivity/
> >
> > Current traceroutes indicate that ESnet is reaching Cogent via
> > 6939_1299.
> >
> > In other news, automatically dropping interconnects at around the time
> > of your HQ's close of business while your peering co-ordinator is on
> > vacation seems to be the new gold standard.
> >
> > Nick
>
> I suppose the moral of the story is: "never single-home to Cogent"
Anybody got draft language for a SLA clause that requires routing 'at least
one hop _past_ the provider's network edge' for every AS visible at major
public peering points and/or LookingGlass sites?
<*EVIL* grin>
