[142178] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cogent depeers ESnet
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert Bonomi)
Sun Jun 19 21:45:36 2011
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 20:43:43 -0500 (CDT)
From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinv6eb35DsGrhgBFN4FYA3GGjeobQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> From georgeb@gmail.com Sun Jun 19 17:48:31 2011
> Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:48:32 -0700
> Subject: Re: Cogent depeers ESnet
> From: "George B." <georgeb@gmail.com>
> To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
> Cc: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com>, nanog@nanog.org
>
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:47 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 03:15:09 CDT, Robert Bonomi said:
> >
> >> Anybody got draft language for a SLA clause that requires routing 'at
> >> least one hop _past_ the provider's network edge' for every AS visible
> >> at major public peering points and/or LookingGlass sites?
> >
> > *every* ASN? Oh my. ;)
No, not an *unqualified* "every ASN".
Merely every one that is 'publicly visible' at any 'signficiant' point on
the network. <*GRIN*>
>
> I would qualify that a bit to say "every ASN available at every peering
> point at which the provider appears".
I wrote it the way I did, because I expressly did not want that loophole.
If a provider claims they provide 'complete' Internet acess, the idea is
to require _complete_ access.
