[141983] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Wed Jun 15 12:54:22 2011
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <4522CE80-08B1-4310-B86F-9CAEA09DCB0E@cs.fiu.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:54:11 -0400
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jun 15, 2011, at 12:47 PM, James Grace wrote:
> So we're running out of peering space in our /24 and we were =
considering using private /30's for new peerings. Are there any =
horrific consequences to picking up this practice?
"Horrific"? How about: "Most peers won't bring up a session."
What happens if the peer is using 1918 space internally?
--=20
TTFN,
patrick
